EPA Mercury Rule: Failing to Protect Texasí Children
Statement of Karen Hadden
Executive Director of the Sustainable Energy and Economic
Development (SEED) Coalition
March 14, 2005
The EPA is finalizing lax mercury rules for coal-burning power plants:
"EPA is failing to protect children from mercury poisoning. Their lax rules would not assure clean up in Texas, the worst state in the nation for toxic power plant mercury. Our children are already at risk for permanent brain damage and learning disabilities, and instead of requiring the clean up we need, EPAís rules would allow polluters to buy their way out of clean-up through a "trading" scheme. This has never before been allowed due to the risk of toxic hotspots. Texas is already the nationís mercury hotspot, and we need clean up to protect our children, not giveaways to utilities." stated Karen Hadden.
"Texas legislators have stepped to the plate to provide protection for Texas children, to accomplish what the EPA previously said can be done, but now refuses to do in cleaning up the mercury from coal-burning power plants. Bills filed by Sen. Zaffirini (SB 1523) and Representative Eddie Rodriguez (HB 2577) would reduce mercury from Texasí coal-burning power plants to 10% of 2002 levels by 2008. " stated Hadden.
Three independent bodies have examined the Administrationís mercury rule, which has failed critical tests:
- The Childrenís Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) is a group of doctors, nurses, and health experts from academia, state agencies, industry and the public sector, all of whom were appointed by the current administration, condemned the EPAís for failing to protect public health. Letters are online: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ochp/ochpweb.nsf/content/whatwe_recomm.htm#8
- The EPA Inspector Generalís report (2/03/05) made it clear that career professionals were told to ignore legal requirements in arriving at a predetermined, politically-driven outcome. Many sections of the rules that eliminate public health protections came from memos from Latham & Watkins, an industry law firm where EPA Asst. Administrator Jeffrey Holmstead worked before coming to EPA. The report is online at: www.cleartheair.org/documents/epa_oig_report.pdf
- The GAO (Government Accountability Office) reported in Feb. 2005 that there
were four major shortcomings in the economic analysis for the EPA mercury rule. The report, online at http://cta.policy.net/reports/GAOreportFeb05.pdf, cited lack of consistency in methods used in comparing options or estimating total costs and benefits of each option, lack of documentation of analysis, failure to estimate health benefits directly related to decreased mercury emissions, and failure to analyze key uncertainties underlying cost and benefit estimates.